Blogger: Alicia Arenas

Alicia Arenas, founder and CEO of Sanera, The People Development Company, is a distinguished business consultant, coach, corporate facilitator, and speaker. Prior to launching Sanera in 2008, Alicia was an accomplished Human Resources leader in corporate America working in Fortune 100 and 500 companies where she led Human Resources teams, mentored leaders, developed strategic operational plans and oversaw training and development at an enterprise level. Alicia earned her SPHR certification in 2001 from The Human Resources Certification Institute.

What Diversity Really Means

There was a pretty fantastic Twitter conversation happening last week on #TChat; it was about diversity. Be sure to check out the preview on MonsterThinking and the #TChat recap.

It was during this conversation that I was reminded of how much I hate the word diversity.

Picture an HR professional being called “personnel” by his or her new CEO and that pretty much captures my reaction.

The word diversity conjures up recollections of:

  • Lame Diversity Day potlucks where departments prepare food from another culture.
  • Feeling proud of a parent company’s sponsorship of the NAACP Image Awards only to discover a judge ordered them to do so because of a class action discrimination lawsuit.
  • A ridiculous attempt to make a newly hired, employee with MS feel “welcome” by telling her peers they have to walk around with a cane for a day.
  • The Diversity Department encouraging gay employees to come out to their coworkers without regard or preparation for the potential fall out and devastating emotional impact that could, and did occur. (Not to mention the resulting drop in productivity, team interventions, EAP referrals and leadership coaching that had to be done after.)

These are all true stories by the way.

It’s these kind of well-intentioned, but poorly planned and executed programs that at best, cause leaders to roll their eyes and at worst, cause them to become more entrenched in their resistance.

So should we give up? Should we stop trying to influence corporate cultures to recognize the importance and value of differences? Absolutely not!

But we need to be realistic about what it takes to change culture and mindset.

The core of diversity lies in understanding that we are better performers, better leaders, better service providers and better people when we surround ourselves with those who are different from us. However, the reality is that most adults are more comfortable with people who are just like them.

Our role is to help leaders move beyond their opposition to contradictory perspectives. It’s to help them move from valuing individuality to valuing what each individual contributes to a team. Our role is to help the highly analytical and highly creative to work together harmoniously instead of a perpetuating an adversarial relationship. This is what having a diversity mindset is all about.

A freakin’ pot luck isn’t going to fix that people.

The language we need to use with executives is relatability to consumers, innovation, increased sales, improved stock prices for shareholders and more profits. These are all natural outcomes of a diversity mindset. The mistake most HR leaders and diversity directors make is talking about this topic in terms of race, gender, age, sexual preference and the EEOC. When we bombard leaders with that language, we relegate this hugely important initiative to the realm of legal imperative instead of business necessity.

Let me conclude by addressing those of you who are going to call me a jaded, former HR professional. You’re right. I am. More importantly, I care deeply about the ethical success of American business; small and large, public and private.

Those are my thoughts. What are yours?

IMAGE VIA John-Morgan

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Our approach to "diversity" is derived from deficit thinking, in my opinion. Our perspectives on race, ethnicity and diversity have germinated from, as former Secretary of State Condoleza Rice so eloquently called it, America's birth defect. These perspectives have become our modus operandi resulting in institutionalized constructs that inform diversity definitions and diversity programs, providing a platform for diversity professionals and the whole industry.

In my professional life I have been both a champion, increasing the diversity of majority white institutions; promoting minority student access; mentoring and increasing the diversity of higher education leadership and critic, most recently writing "Coming From America: The Mis-Education Of A White Washed Negro" http://t.co/JT97WpU

Diversity is life on this planet. Like air, it is nature's, or some would say God's, plan. Until we address the defect that undermines this fact, focusing on cultural tranformation within subsectors of this society will never work. It is like applying a topical ointment to a birth defect.

What an insightful perspective. You (and Condi) are right - diversity is more than what happens in corporations, it is life and needs to be addressed on a larger scale.

I'd like to share a story with you.

For 11 years, I volunteered on the board of a non-profit that provided services to babies with disabilities and their families. This organization also had a fully inclusive after school program for Pre-schoolers through 2nd grade.

I'll never forget visiting the school one day and seeing the kindergarten class on the playground. They were multi-cultural: White, African American, European, Mexican and Chinese. They were also able-bodied and disabled.

There was a little boy in the class with Downs Syndrome who pulled a little oxygen tank with him. When I came to the playground, several of the able-bodied Kindergarteners immediately came to me. With a no-nonsense attitude, they instructed me, "Be careful around Evan. Don't step on the tubes because they help him breathe." Then they ran off to help Evan get on the swing.

That brief moment gave me hope. Those children didn't appreciate the differences in Evan. They *didn't see* the differences.

What a world we would live in if we the differences were invisible to us, just like the were to those kids.

So much of what most people associate with "diversity" is attributed to superficial characteristics that we cannot control – skin color, ethnicity, age, physical ability, attractiveness. If we were all literally blind, the term “diversity” might relate to something more meaningful, as in diversity of thought, values, skills, experiences, and opinions. My 2 cents…

Your 2 cents are worth thousands of dollars. I wholeheartedly agree with you. In fact, if we were able to incorporate the more meaningful areas of diversity into organizational culture, I think the superficial characteristics of diversity would be more accepted. Thank you for your insights.

I'm still puzzled.. I do know what the conflict is between diversity and culture: culture is what connects people, diversity is what sets people apart and thus what attacks this group-feeling. this is why people are scared of the term. So you need to explain that opening up your organizational culture is good for the business. Responsibility? business managers, rather than HR-pro's, who should ask: what is missing here? and the answer is given by some outsider, responding: have you ever thought of...

Thanks for stopping by Hans. You have an interesting perspective about the differences between org culture and diversity. Are you saying that an organization's culture is the umbrella under which diversity (among other things) fall?