Blogger: Omowale Casselle

After graduating from business school, I took the entrepreneurial leap and co-founded mySenSay--a social recruiting community that helps top companies and next generation student leaders make better employment decisions. Prior to founding mySenSay, I was part of the product development team that successfully brought industry-leading vehicles from concept to market including Ford Mustang, Ford Fusion, and Ford Escape Hybrid. At Ford, I also recruited talented undergraduate and graduate students for full-time and internship opportunities as the co-chair of the University of Illinois campus recruiting team. In business school, I gained investment and operational experience while splitting my time between an early-stage venture capital firm and one of their clean-technology portfolio companies. My passion for continuous learning and development has led to degrees from Harvard Business School (MBA), University of Michigan-Dearborn (MS Engineering), and University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (BS Engineering). Throughout my professional career, I have been excited most by the challenge of bringing new innovations to market and on the leadership skills required to effectively collaborate with diverse teams of engineering and business professionals.

Preventing Unforced Social Recruiting Errors

Usually, one of the key characteristics of champions is that they have an amazing ability to prevent themselves from making unforced errors. Opponents will often try to force you into situations that they can utilize to their advantage. But, if you can do those things that you do well on a consistent basis without making mistakes, you will often come out ahead. As we know, nothing is more important for the sustainable competitive advantage of employers than the ability to continually attract, recruit, and retain top employees.

As we move further and further into the emerging territory of socialization and online recruiting there is an increased opportunity to make unforced errors. The primary reason is that the rules aren’t well defined so both candidates and employers are as awkward as two teenagers on a first date. Each wants to impress the other, yet neither knows exactly what to do or how to do it. This uncertainty is combined with the fact that there are some people who would be totally happy to see you fail.  The key is to stay focused on your employer value proposition and effectively communicate that with candidates.

If not, you’ll find yourself making unforced errors which will compound the already difficult challenges of recruiting in an emerging environment.

So, what are the unforced errors that you should be on the lookout for?

Instigators

As long as people have been interacting in the online environment, there have been a small group of people who are interested in stirring the pot for no other reason than to make others angry. These people who have far too much time on their hands will attempt to take advantage of the increased access to employees to engage in anti-social behavior.  Without discipline, your company can easily end up making an unforced error. This can happen by either engaging in unprofessional back/forth discussions or circular arguments. To prevent this, you must remember the purpose of your online activity. Your #1 goal is to attract, recruit, and retain the top talent that will increase the competitive advantage of your organization. Anything that is counter to that purpose should be ignored. The immediacy of social media and social networking makes it more likely that instigators will try to bait you into arguments. But, you should take steps to ensure that ambassadors for your organization have the discipline to maintain their composure when engaged by instigators.

Disgruntled Candidates

After going through perhaps a phone screen or an in-person interview, this person has not advanced to the next stage in the process. Unfortunately, they don’t agree with your rationale. So, their goal is to create a scorched earth policy within your current social recruiting efforts. This person will not make it clear that they are a candidate that wasn’t selected. Instead, they will try to use social discussions to highlight perceived flaws within your company that they feel will make your opportunity less attractive to prospective candidates. It is important to diplomatically take these discussions offline. Not because you are trying to create the impression that your company is without flaws, but instead these people are presenting information about your company without the proper context (rejected candidate who has a score to settle). These discussions can be extremely confusing to prospective candidates and can do significant damage if your employees engage publicly.

Competitors

As we’ve seen from the different anti-poaching agreements that have recently come to light, most employers recognize the need to win the war for talent. Competitors have an opportunity to create unforced errors by using their industry knowledge as well as their understanding of your competitive advantage. Often, competitors will not have deep insights about what exactly it is like to work at your company. But, their knowledge is dangerous enough to create challenges with your social recruiting efforts. If you are in a discussion with someone who appears to have the level/quality of information as a competitor, it is important to reinforce your unique value proposition. Remember, your competitor is just as convinced that their value proposition is superior to theirs as you are. This is a great opportunity to communicate exactly what your advantages are for prospective candidates. Don’t be tricked into argue your value proposition on their terms.

As an increasing number of employer and candidate interactions happen within the online environment, it is extremely important not to make unforced errors. We see that there can be a variety of different scenarios that might lead you in this direction. What other unforced errors have you seen employers make and what advice do you have for preventing it?

IMAGE VIA chascow

About the AuthorOmowale Casselle (@mySenSay) is the co-founder and CEO of mySenSay. We help top companies and future leaders make better employment decisions.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Great post. The good news is I haven't heard of too many high-profile online scuffles of late, although I know they're happening.

The reality-check business fact is, you're just not going to make everyone happy, especially when you can't hire everyone (or keep everyone already on the inside). I agree with David's comment that leadership at all levels, including HR, recruiting and hiring managers, must do a much better job with the candidate experience. Acknowledge their interest and give them succinct closure when they don't get hired (or when they do -- get your onboarding in order as well).

The messy unforced errors that create a combative candidate experience could really come back to haunt you, not so much that someone may rant online about you for a while, but also because every turned away candidate and dismissed employee is a potential customer.

That's why the business case is clear to me.

Kevin,

Thanks for reinforcing that prospective candidates may also be or are already customers of your company. When placed in that context, it really makes no sense not to work hard at preventing unforced errors. If you don't, you may not only lose prospective candidates but also customers.

Omowale Casselle

Excellent post. This is one of the best things I've read on this topic!

Sincerely,

Margo Rose
http://hirefriday,com

Thanks Margo. I appreciate your feedback.

A true leader looks to themselves to assign blame before blaming others. This article fails to look at the unforced errors caused by a failure to plan. These failures have a negative impact on the employer brand. Some examples:

1. The company that tells prospects information that later changes giving an impression the company was dishonest. "We plan to have someone hired by..." "You did great on this interview and I'm going to move you to the next level." but then told the position is filled.
2. Publishing information that is easily contradicted by employees who use social media.
3. The recruiter and hiring manager who are not communicating. The recruiter contacts someone and asks if they are interested in a position only to be told by the hiring manager they don't have the qualifications they seek.

Organizations should take a closer look internally to determine if they have done something to create the instigators and disgruntled candidates. Typically something the organization has done creates this negative feeling in these people. Its too easy to dismiss these people and never correct your own failings.

David,

Great addition to the original post. There are certainly many steps that organizations can take in the planning phase to ensure that they are not unconsciously upsetting prospective candidates.

Omowale